Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers
Friday, December 05, 2008 |
|
RNC Chair Race |
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
12:06 PM |
I'm hearing rumors that Ken Blackwell has announced today, though I cannot confirm it, yet...
|
|
|
Friday, December 05, 2008 |
|
RNC Chair: GA Victory Proves 'Republicans Do Know How to Win Elections' |
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
11:49 AM |
|
I just completed my much-anticipated interview with RNC Chairman Mike Duncan, and he had some very interesting things to say about Saxby Chambliss' win in Georgia's Senate runoff.
Specifically, Duncan implied the Georgia results prove that Barack Obama does not have coattails in elections where he is not on the ballot (this, of course, is great news going into 2010).
The numbers seem to confirm this: Saxby took home a whopping 57% of the vote in his runoff against Democrat Jim Martin, compared to 49% in the general election. Duncan concluded that this was partly due to the fact that Obama's personal dynamism drove up turnout in the general, driving up the vote for Martin.
However, the Obama effect could not be replicated when Martin was running by himself.
In my opinion, this means that the Chambliss race is really the first race of the 2010 elections -- where congressional Democrats will have to stand on their own two feet -- rather than counting on Obama to drag them into office.
In short, the theory is that Obama is a singular phenomenon, and people do not seem to be associating him down-ticket Democratic candidates at all.
Duncan also refuted the idea that Georgia represented a safe (and therefore meaningless) GOP seat. He pointed o the fact that Chambliss not only beat Martin, but blew him out of the water with a 14% margin of victory. This was not the tight race that many Democrats had hoped for, and the GOP was able to implement a successful campaign to ensure that Martin never came close to unseating Saxby.
Duncan said that this race represented a "team effort" between the RNC and the local organizations in Georgia, and that the RNC provided the "ground game" necessary to push Chambliss over the top (volunteers were brought in from all over the country to help out).
According to Duncan, this race will help lift the spirits of the party faithful and increase with recruiting good candidates in the future. The chairman says that this victory proves that "Republicans do know how to win elections," and that is a message that people need to hear as we ramp up for 2010.
Townhall's Adam Brickley contributed to this post.
|
|
|
Friday, December 05, 2008 |
|
O'Reilly to Quit Radio Show to Focus on TV |
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
10:24 AM |
The Daily News reports...
O'Reilly said the radio show, which he launched in May 2002, will end "in the first quarter of next year." Most of the time he saves, he said, will go into his top-rated Fox News Channel show.
"The media business is getting more and more intense," O'Reilly said Thursday. "We've got to keep the TV show at the level we have it now, and that means more and more time to keep it competitive and fresh. I've been working 60, 65 hours a week and I just can't keep doing that."
Nationally, O'Reilly's radio show is carried on 430 stations, including WOR (710 AM) in New York). Talkers magazine estimates his weekly audience at more than 3.5 million, putting him in the national top 10, and while no official figures are available on advertising, executives close to the show described it as very profitable.
|
|
|
Thursday, December 04, 2008 |
|
Chambliss's Victory Might Have Saved Norm Coleman, Too... |
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
11:04 AM |
Earlier I noted that it's possible for the Dems to "steal" the MN senate seat, because the senate gets to decide who "wins". On the other side of the argument, however, is Michael Barone who makes a particularly noteworthy point: A consequence of Chambliss winning is that Al Franken’s importance as a possible addition to the Democratic Senate bloc diminishes...
This is especially true because getting Franken in the Senate would entail Obama (and the Dems) expending political capital that could be better used on other things. What is more, getting Franken in the Senate might not be worth the predictable backlash that would ensue if it were perceived to have been done in a heavy-handed manner.
Here's a excerpt of the Barone piece:
Chambliss's victory over Jim Martin means that the Democrats will not get 60 seats in the Senate, even if Al Franken somehow manages to overcome Norm Coleman's circa 300-vote lead in the Minnesota recount. Franken's only apparent recourse is to the courts or to the full Senate; I doubt he'll get anywhere in the courts, and I doubt that Barack Obama will want the Democrats to take on a bruising partisan fight to get a 59th seat in the Senate (though labor leaders, eager to pass the card check bill and knowing that Arlen Specter voted to cut off the filibuster against it in the outgoing Congress, may press for that). In short, Chambiss's victory might have also saved Norm Coleman...
|
|
|
Thursday, December 04, 2008 |
|
Re: The Big Three are Testifying Now |
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
10:32 AM |
... how do the three Detroit CEOs plan to go home? Are they driving? Because if they are taking private jets, they're going to look really stupid again...
|
|
|
Thursday, December 04, 2008 |
|
John Fund Predicts ... |
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
8:58 AM |
Yesterday I attended an event featuring The Wall Street Journal's John Fund, who gave a fascinating talk about his book "Stealing Elections".
Fund is always an entertaining and insightful speaker, and on this occasion, he made two predictions which caught my attention:
1. Fund predicted that the first bill Obama signs as president will be to mandate national "same day" voter registration. His reasoning is that the first bill that Bill Clinton signed was "motor voter." Obviously, this bill would go a long way toward making sure future elections can be stolen by groups like ACORN, etc.
2. Fund predicted that even if Norm Coleman is certified the winner of the MN senate race over Al Franken, Harry Reid will refuse to seat him.
As Fund explained, this is not unprecedented; In 1984, the House of Representatives refused to seat Indiana Republican Rick McIntyre who narrowly defeated his Democratic opponent Frank McCloskey by 34 votes -- even though the Republican was certified by the Indiana Secretary of State. McCloskey ended up winning the seat in 1986.
Under the Constitution, the senate gets to decide who the winner was.
In short, Harry Reid and the Democrats who control the senate could decide that MN should have counted the rejected absentee ballots which would have elected Franken if counted.
According to Article I, Sec. 5 the senate can choose whom to swear-in -- regardless of who the SoS certifies as the winner:
"Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members" It will be interesting to see if either of these events occur, but either way, it is wise to anticipate the possibility that history might repeat itself...
|
|
|
Wednesday, December 03, 2008 |
|
NBC Washington Bureau Chief: Bush Won't be Reading any Books |
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
4:15 PM |
Anyone doubting the existence of a liberal media bias need look no further than this week's The Chris Matthews Show.
In response to Matthews' question about whether upon leaving office, "George W. Bush (will) simply retreat completely from public life," Mark Whitaker -- the NBC Washington bureau chief -- demonstrated why most Americans view the establishment media as biased.
Here's the exchange over the future of President Bush:
Mr. WHITAKER: I don't think one of the least intellectually curious presidents we've had is going...is going to spend his retirement writing books or probably even reading books. However, look...
MATTHEWS: This is why they hate us, Mark. This is why--this is why they hate us.
(Yes -- that is why they hate you...)
|
|
|
Wednesday, December 03, 2008 |
|
(Ambinder's Blog) On Obama's Citizenship... |
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
3:10 PM |
Marc Ambinder takes issue today with an email sent out by Townhall.com regarding Obama's birth certificate.
My immediate response to Marc would be that to understand Townhall is to understand that we represent a broad array of conservative voices and opinions. In fact, we do not even publish editorials or take editorial positions. What is more, clearly we have regular writers (Kathleen Parker, for example) who express viewpoints that I personally find absurd, offensive and often childish. Clearly some conservatives out there like her though -- so we still run her columns ...
This whole notion of Obama's birth certificate, however, is something I've been meaning to write about anyway, as I have grown very tired of seeing a few of our commenters dwell on this ridiculous rumor.
I am of the opinion that anyone advancing the notion that Obama is not a citizen, and thus not qualified to become president, is actually undermining the conservative cause. Sadly, this ridiculous "conspiracy theory" will only serve to undermine the legitimate attacks on Obama, by casting us all in the role of zealots.
All indications are that Obama was born in the state of Hawaii. His mother was clearly an American citizen. In many regards, Obama has more of a claim to be eligible for the presidency than did Barry Goldwater (born in the "Arizona territory"), George Romney (born in Mexico), or John McCain (born in the Panama Canal Zone)...
There are plenty of legitimate reasons to criticize Obama, but dwelling on this ridiculous notion will only serve to undermine them.
To answer Marc's question of whether or not this is a legitimate question to ask, I would only reply that this is a legitimate topic if you believe in free speech. Moreover, it is not racist, sexist, or vulgar -- just (in my opinion) very destructive and unhelpful to those who care about advancing the cause of conservatism...
|
|
|
Wednesday, December 03, 2008 |
|
Franken Leading? |
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
2:47 PM |
Well...not really. According to The Hill, Al Franken's campaign claims that their internal vote totals show him leading Norm Coleman by 22 votes. Most media reports, however, are showing Coleman up by about 300 votes. A Coleman spokesman is quoted as saying that Franken's numbers are "not credible, and we expect the media to demand the full and complete explanation."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Blog Postings:
|
|
Last updated 11 Minutes 49 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 13 Minutes 20 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 18 Minutes 27 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 36 Minutes 39 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 39 Minutes 1 Seconds Ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs
|
|
| | | |